HCAH is a healthcare company with recovery centres across 7 tier-1 cities in India. It has helped over 25,000 people recover from stroke, trauma and neurological conditions.
Care plan management involved therapy and nursing heads, therapists, and the billing team—from creating and executing plans to adding completed services to patient bills.
The process relied on Excel sheets, notebooks, and manual handoffs, leading to billing inaccuracies and significant time spent managing care plans.
I designed a new end-to-end workflow where therapy and nursing heads can create and manage care plan on IRIS, a web-based patient management tool built for the staff at the recovery centre.
At HCAH's recovery centres, care plans lived across Excel sheets and paper notebooks and were passed by hand between therapy heads, therapists and billing, so patient bills drifted from what had actually been done.
Care plans were tracked across Excel sheets and paper notebooks, with no single source of truth.
Managing and updating individual patient care plans was time consuming for staff.
The workflow depended on multiple manual handoffs between therapy heads, therapists, and the billing team.
Manual processes increased billing errors.
I spoke with 27 staff across the three roles that touch a care plan. The finding that shaped the design: updating a plan cost staff more time than creating one.
I talked to the ground staff of the recovery centre to know their current workflow and challenges.
Responsible for creating and tracking care plans
Responsible for executing the care plan
Responsible for adding care plan items to the bill
One connected flow inside IRIS: therapy heads create the plan, therapists mark work done on the app, and billing only steps in to correct exceptions.
Together with the PM, we redesigned the care plan workflow to reduce manual coordination and address the needs of all stakeholders.
Creation and changes only
Completed activities automatically update the care plan and billing
Only reviews and corrects exceptions when required
With the care plan in one place and updates flowing automatically from the therapists who do the work, the manual handoffs that caused billing errors disappeared.
Two things I took from building this: a single source of truth beat adding features, and designing per role made a dense tool feel simple.
The biggest wins came from getting everyone onto the same plan, not from adding capability on top of a fragmented process.
Tailoring each view to what a role needs to do next made a dense tool feel simple for everyone who used it.